AVoIP, Industry Buzzwords and Market Hype – Cutting Through the Cr*p to Focus on What’s Important.
Don’t you
just love industry buzzwords. AV over IP. Networked AV. Networked Video. IPTV on the LAN. Even HDMI
over Ethernet. All pretty much the same thing expressed in different ways.
Every
vendor tries to coin ‘their’ phrase – a slightly different take on a current technology
trend or ‘buzz-term’ that’s riding high in the industry. It’s easy to be taken
in by the hype, publicity and industry noise with this stuff, but whatever anyone
wants to call it, distributing AV signals over an IT network is where things have
been going for a long time, whether you like it or not. So sorting out the
‘FUD’ (fear, uncertainty, doubt) factor, or even worse that FOMO (fear of
missing out) feeling, is crucial so you can then focus on what’s actually
important in all this hyperbole. So maybe this will perhaps simplify things..
This is Nothing New
Many of the
challenges faced in today’s AV world – not only by AV integrators but also IT
managers – have been seen in the past many times with similar technologies, in
particular, VoIP. Distribution of real-time voice over the IT network was as
much a challenge then as distributing video over the IT network is now. And having
been involved – for better or for worse – with both technologies from their
outset (having deployed AVoIP systems for many years now, and VoIP for….well
let’s just say decades) I can safely say that the IT network is more than
capable of handling real-time, on demand traffic – even high-bandwidth traffic
– problem free, if properly designed.
So…What’s Important?
Well, it’s
getting the basics right
Like most
things you design and build, first you need to get the foundations right. The
infrastructure needs to be robust and dependable. And with an AVoIP system that’s
no different. The AVoIP’s infrastructure is of course the IT network. Regardless
of what application is using the AVoIP solution, whether IPTV on the LAN,
meeting room video conference systems, or simply digital signage, the devices you use, and what carries the
signals across the system, needs to reliable. Whether it’s a video compressed
solution or not, whether it’s a 1GB or 10Gb network, or whether it’s a one
switch system or a network of interlinked switches deployed across a campus, the
requirement for a solid network is a pre-requisite.
Which is
good news. Because Ethernet networks have been around for, well, nearly half a
century now as a best guess, and they’re not going anywhere soon, so I think we
can safely say they’ve stood the test of time.
The AVoIP devices are, of course, just network
devices. Designed to work on an IP network. So, they adhere (or at least the
ones from reputable manufacturers should) to the requirements of the IP
network, just the same as any other network device. Because remember, we’re
talking about standards here. Ethernet and IP. Something that’s a bit more
alien to the traditional the AV industry manufacturers, who still peddle
proprietary matrix switch systems and push isolated technologies such as
HDBaseT.
Having
network-compliant AV devices means they then can be managed, accessed and
controlled via the network making the network administrator’s life much easier.
Even if it’s a separate network built specifically for AV, the mechanisms used
and conditions required remain the same. Multicast technology and IGMP for
distributing video and audio streams optimally, or things like telnet or JSON
or AJAX or HTTP or SSH for communication, or SNMP for monitoring, or AES
encryption of the video streams, all this is needed for adherence of the company’s
network and security policies.
Are features important?
So what do
you need your AV system to do? Distribute video and audio signals around the
place? Well yes, that for one. What about USB communications? Or IR? Or RS232?
Well, leveraging the inherent capability of the IP network, you can use
multicast to send anything, anywhere…and everywhere. It doesn’t matter from
which source to which display, whatever the signal is, IP doesn’t really care
what the content is – the AVoIP devices such as IPTV Headends turn those signals
into IP packets and the network switches take care of the rest, shipping those
packets across to it’s destination(s) regardless. No physically, special or
different cabling, or connectors or routing or anything else – same device,
same infrastructure.
This is all
part-and-parcel of a fully equipped AV over IP system. Again, it’s just
utilizing the IP network’s ability to send any type of data or image type,
anywhere. If your AVoIP is missing even one of these features, then you’re
being short-changed.
What about Latency?
Well….what
about it? How important is it to your AV application? Is true, real-time AV transmission
with almost no discernible difference (at least to the naked eye) between
source and display important to the application?
If we take
the medical industry as an example, or command-and-control center applications,
latency is (or the lack of it) is of major importance. There are AV over IP systems
are able to offer this capability using solutions that are able to ship the
video, audio, USB and whatever else you need in an uncompressed format across
with minimum (almost zero) latency – regardless of video resolution.
Less
delay-sensitive applications such as meeting room solutions or perhaps IPTV
distribution could get away with a lightly compressed technology such as
JPEG2000. Even less sensitive to latency applications such as digital signage
can use heavier compressed technologies which use less bandwidth like H.264.
Bottom line is, whatever your AV application needs, there is an AVoIP solution
to satisfy it.
Of course
there are many other considerations to take into account when designing in an AVoIP
system, but getting the basics right first is a critical factor in achieving a
successful and problem free installation.
There will
be some variations in how different networks are implemented and operate – some
installations will have a 10Gb network to service an uncompressed video
solution, others a 1Gb to cater for their compressed video option. Some AVoIP
systems may be installed on a dedicated switch or network, others may be
sharing the core customer network. Fundamentally however how the network
functions in terms of distributing video from one end to the other remains
pretty much the same, as it’s, as we said, standards based.
So the
dependability of the network is a major consideration, and contrary what to
many AVoIP vendors might be telling you (in that that networks are complex and
intricate things and need specialist intervention to set up and run – so you
can be more dependent on them) they are, in comparison to proprietary matrix
switches, easy to configure, with only a few parameters required.
And that’s
an important distinction. It’s about configuration with AVoIP – not complex
programming like proprietary systems.
Get the
basics right and there’s no reason why you cannot have a robust, dependable and
functional, long term AV system that works over IP.
Comments
Post a Comment